RMGlasgow

RMGlasgow

° that Employ Millions guy °

In development of a public utility to replace normal mapping of participants so all activity is safe, I tend to look at connectivity as a right where ownership includes the transit of data of any content created.
Activity within a public realm has no class problem, because the objects contain no data in a usual way. The use of migration platforms doesn’t scare me because the data is not worthy of investment from anything except public momentum. Activity shapes markets where honesty is a driving force and the data that most applications use may be good for when distributing the “object” as presented by the “owner” allowing more distribution along any revenue stream the object may attach to.
My public utility is waiting for approval from the USPTO. The idea is a process to allow for use in communities anywhere. By removing the person from the object, the ownership becomes key. By making ownership that of a pool, the reliability and performance enhancements are accelerated. Think of covalent bonds. Now think of the grid or map area of activity as if it were a structure within a chemical matrix where reaction creates more activity.
Anyway, it takes millions to drive meaningful events, and who would have thought that meaningless objects could do all of the work?
Mine is more of a jobs program than an entertainment node, but fun is fun and who am I to say what fun is. Let’s just put everyone to work making fun for all while producing needed funds as a communities deem fit.